The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2001
Heparin antibodies and thromboembolism in heparin-coated and noncoated ventricular assist devices.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koster A, Loebe M, Sodian R, Potapov E V, Hansen R, Müller J, Mertzlufft F, Crystal G J, Kuppe H, Hetzer R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Coating of ventricular assist devices (VADs) with heparin improves the biocompatibility and may reduce the need for systemic anticoagulation. However, heparins are associated with the risk of formation of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies (HPF4/A) and the development of heparin-associated thromboemboli. We analyzed the occurrence of HPF4/A and thromboembolism in patients with heparin-coated and noncoated VADs.
METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the investigation. Fifty-seven received a heparin-coated (group 1) and 43 a noncoated (group 2) VAD. HPF4/A testing was performed before and 2 and 12 weeks after implantation by the heparin platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of HPF4/A in the 2 groups (P =.102). Before the operation, 21 of the patients in group 1 had positive test responses and 25 in group 2. No patient had HPF4/A after termination of systemic heparinization. In group 1 there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent pump thromboses in patients who had positive test responses for HPF4/A (n = 11) when compared with those who had negative test responses (n = 9, P =.89). Twenty-one patients had HPF/A but no thromboembolism. However, all 22 patients who had thromboembolism had HPF4/A.
CONCLUSIONS: Heparin coating of the VAD surface does not enhance the occurrence of HPF4/A-associated immunologic or thrombogenic reactions. However, the presence of these antibodies is strongly associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism in patients with a VAD.
METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the investigation. Fifty-seven received a heparin-coated (group 1) and 43 a noncoated (group 2) VAD. HPF4/A testing was performed before and 2 and 12 weeks after implantation by the heparin platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of HPF4/A in the 2 groups (P =.102). Before the operation, 21 of the patients in group 1 had positive test responses and 25 in group 2. No patient had HPF4/A after termination of systemic heparinization. In group 1 there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent pump thromboses in patients who had positive test responses for HPF4/A (n = 11) when compared with those who had negative test responses (n = 9, P =.89). Twenty-one patients had HPF/A but no thromboembolism. However, all 22 patients who had thromboembolism had HPF4/A.
CONCLUSIONS: Heparin coating of the VAD surface does not enhance the occurrence of HPF4/A-associated immunologic or thrombogenic reactions. However, the presence of these antibodies is strongly associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism in patients with a VAD.