MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/14796694.2024.2348440

Медицинская библиотека · Future oncology (London, England) · 2024

Patient preferences for chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments: a discrete-choice experiment.

Ravelo Arliene, Myers Kelley, Brumble Robyn, Bussberg Cooper, Koffman Brian, Manzoor Beenish S, Biondo Juliana M L, Mansfield Carol

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Aim: Patient preferences for the features of targeted chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) therapies may differ.Materials & methods: A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to 229 respondents recruited through the CLL Society.

Results

Respondents placed most importance on increasing the chance of progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years from 70 to 90% and confirming results with measurable residual disease (MRD) testing instead of routine testing. Respondents also preferred daily oral administration over intravenous infusion every 4 weeks, fixed-duration treatments over treat-to-progression treatments and treatments with lower side effect risks. Reducing risk of tumor lysis syndrome was least important relative to changes in other attributes.

Conclusion

The combination of improving PFS combined with confirming results using MRD testing was more important than changes in all other study attributes included in the DCE. Results from this study can help inform shared decision-making when selecting therapies for CLL.

Для цитирования: Ravelo Arliene, Myers Kelley, Brumble Robyn, Bussberg Cooper, Koffman Brian, Manzoor Beenish S, Biondo Juliana M L, Mansfield Carol. Patient preferences for chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments: a discrete-choice experiment.. Future oncology (London, England). 2024. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2348440.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.