MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000519947

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in neurology · 2022

An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Prognosis in a Young Woman with New-Onset Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Report.

Juneja Pallavi, Swor Dionne

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare clinical diagnosis. Autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic encephalitis are the most common identifiable etiologies of NORSE; of the known autoimmune encephalitides, <200 cases of GAD65-related epilepsy have been reported in the literature. We describe a case of a 24-year-old female who presented with confusion and myoclonus. Electroencephalogram revealed NORSE that evolved into super-refractory status epilepticus. Her CSF showed a mild lymphocytic pleocytosis, and her MRI demonstrated changes in the bilateral temporal lobes. She was ultimately diagnosed with GAD65 autoimmune encephalitis and treated with immune-modulating therapy. This case highlights the complex diagnostic workup of patients with NORSE and the utility of validated prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis. While maintaining a broad differential, the patient's Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy (APE) score was a helpful clinical tool to support the pursuit of an autoimmune etiology. We also underline the need to concomitantly treat patients quickly during diagnostic workup because earlier treatment increases the Response to Immunotherapy in Epilepsy (RITE) score, indicating a more favorable prognosis.

Для цитирования: Juneja Pallavi, Swor Dionne. An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Prognosis in a Young Woman with New-Onset Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Report.. Case reports in neurology. 2022. DOI: 10.1159/000519947.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.