MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/brb3.2356

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and behavior · 2021

A meta-analysis of comparisons of various surgical treatments for moyamoya diseases.

Lin Kai, Sui Shaohua, Zhao Jing, Zhang Liyong, Chen Kun

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Ischemia is one of the most familiar complications in the different procedures for moyamoya disease (MMD), but the optimal surgical approaches for MMD remain unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various surgical treatments.

METHODS

A literature search word was performed through four databases such as Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for the literature published until May 2021. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. A random/fixed-effects model was used to pool.

RESULTS

There are a total of 18 studies including three surgical treatments such as including indirect, direct, and combined bypass in this study. The result revealed that indirect bypass was related to a higher incidence of recurrence stroke compared to the direct and combined bypass treatment (p = .001). Furthermore, the cases undergoing direct bypass were associated with a better angiographic change than the indirect bypass (OR = 3.254, p = .013).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a positive effect of using the direct and combined bypass to treat MMD compared to indirect bypass due to their lower rates of recurrence stroke.

Для цитирования: Lin Kai, Sui Shaohua, Zhao Jing, Zhang Liyong, Chen Kun. A meta-analysis of comparisons of various surgical treatments for moyamoya diseases.. Brain and behavior. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2356.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.