MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004688

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025

Outcome evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis for an integrated multidisciplinary diabetic limb salvage program: a combined observational and simulation study.

Ge Lixia, Sun Yan, Tan Elaine, Liew Huiling, Hoe Jeremy, Lin Jaime, Molina Joseph, Ang Gary, Zhu Xiaoli, Low Kai Qiang, Yap Theophilus, Azmi Nur Aberleen Syafirah Binte, Yong Enming, Chew Tiffany, Koo Hui Yan, Law Chelsea, Chan Dexter Yak Seng, Shi Claris, Choo Julia, Hoi Wai Han, Chandraskear Sadhana, Lim Jo Ann, Siow Jemes, Kaspon Sabariah Binte, Tavintharan Subramaniam, Chew Daniel, Abisheganaden John, Lo Zhiwen Joseph

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

To compare the clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization of patients enrolled in the multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care program with a matched historical cohort and estimate the program's long-term cost-effectiveness using simulation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS

This study consisted of two components: a 1-year observational outcome evaluation and a long-term simulation-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). We conducted an observational study to analyze 2798 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) enrolled in the program between June 2020 and June 2021 (DEFINITE Care group) and 5462 patients with DFUs from June 2016 to December 2017 as historical controls. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) with replacement was conducted to estimate the treatment effect of the program on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization over 1 year. For the simulation component, a long-term CEA was performed using a Markov state transition model on a simulated cohort of 10 000 patients with DFUs over a 20-year period, assessing transitions between health states, including minor and major amputations and death. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for the DEFINITE Care program relative to routine care.

RESULTS

The estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores showed that the DEFINITE Care group exhibited a 9% lower mortality, 5% higher lower extremity amputation (LEA)-free survival, yet a 5% higher minor LEA rate compared with the matched historical controls. Additionally, they experienced fewer inpatient admissions (0.98 fewer episodes) and shorter hospital stays (5.5 fewer days) within 1 year (p-value <0.001). The ICER was US$22 707 (SE: 430) per quality-adjusted life year gained, indicating long-term cost-effectiveness. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated multidisciplinary DEFINITE Care program improved LEA-free survival, reduced inpatient admissions and length of stay within 1 year and demonstrated long-term cost-effectiveness managing DFUs.

Для цитирования: Ge Lixia, Sun Yan, Tan Elaine, Liew Huiling, Hoe Jeremy, Lin Jaime, Molina Joseph, Ang Gary, Zhu Xiaoli, Low Kai Qiang, Yap Theophilus, Azmi Nur Aberleen Syafirah Binte, Yong Enming, Chew Tiffany, Koo Hui Yan, Law Chelsea, Chan Dexter Yak Seng, Shi Claris, Choo Julia, Hoi Wai Han, Chandraskear Sadhana, Lim Jo Ann, Siow Jemes, Kaspon Sabariah Binte, Tavintharan Subramaniam, Chew Daniel, Abisheganaden John, Lo Zhiwen Joseph. Outcome evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis for an integrated multidisciplinary diabetic limb salvage program: a combined observational and simulation study.. BMJ open diabetes research & care. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004688.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.