Journal of ovarian research · 2025
Cryopreservation and transplantation of ovarian tissue as post-cancer tissue therapy and an activator of oogenesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Isachenko Volodimir, Morgenstern Bernd, Todorov Plamen, Isachenko Evgenia, Nawroth Frank, Quassdorff Maria, Salama Mahmoud, Mallmann-Gottschalk Nina, Merzenich Markus, Skala Christine, Rahimi Gohar
Аннотация
In a recent publication (Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2024) it was presented point of view that, for post-cancer patients, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a more effective method than ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). In their commentary, Andersen et al. (Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2024) present nine distinct arguments advocating for the use of OTC. We fully agree with all these points. In support of the clinical application of the OTC procedure, we introduce two additional arguments. First, the transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue can be considered as a form of tissue therapy. Moreover, OTC inherently serves as an activator of oogenesis. Second, during tissue dissection prior to OTC, a significant number of germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes can be retrieved, matured to the metaphase II (MII) stage, cryopreserved, and later used in IVF procedures.