MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000735

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2017

Albumin Use in Patients With Cirrhosis in France: Results of the "ALBU-LIVE" Survey: A Case for Better EASL Guidelines Diffusion and/or Revision.

Garioud Armand, Cadranel Jean-François, Pauwels Arnaud, Nousbaum Jean-Baptiste, Thévenot Thierry, Dao Thong, Louvet Alexandre, Sogni Philippe, Talbodec Nathalie, Antonini Teresa M, Bureau Christophe, Thabut Dominique, Elkrief Laure, Jouannaud Vincent, Macaigne Gilles, Bernard-Chabert Brigitte, Lison Hortensia, Alric Laurent, Carbonell Nicolas, Labadie Héléne, Amiot Xavier, Abergel Armand, Hanslik Bertrand, Leroy Vincent, De Lédinghen Victor, Denis Jacques, Association Nationale des Hépato-gastroentérologues des Hôpitaux Généraux de France, Association Française pour l’Etude du Foie, Club de Réflexion des Cabinets et Groupes d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The use of human albumin for the management of cirrhosis has increased. Recommendations have been published for therapeutic paracentesis (TP), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The goal of this survey was to assess the prescription practices of French hepatogastroenterologists.

METHODS

All hepatogastroenterologists were contacted. The questionnaire evaluated (1) the use of albumin in validated indications and (2) the prescription of albumin for nonvalidated clinical situations.

RESULTS

Responses were analyzed from 451 (50.1%) practitioners. The mean age was 40 years (range, 24 to 67 y). Physicians practiced in a university hospital (47.7%) or a general hospital (45.8%). There were 56.7% senior practitioners. Overall 99.6% of the practitioners compensated for TP. Albumin was used by 87.8% of the physicians, with a fixed dose being used by 84.6%. For SBP, 94% of the physicians used albumin concomitantly with antibiotics. The recommended protocol was followed by 56.2% of the practitioners: more often by senior university hospital practitioners than by senior general hospital practitioners (P=0.015). About 66.5% used albumin infusion for the diagnosis of HRS: used more often by senior university hospital practitioners (P=0.0006). Albumin was used concomitantly with vasopressor treatment by 84%; the dose and the duration varied considerably. About 23.5% used albumin for severe bacterial infection, 47.9% for severe hyponatremia, 43.9% for severe hypoalbuminemia, and 65.9% for hydrothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large French survey, albumin is only prescribed in accordance with recommendations for TP. The schedule for SBP is followed by only 56% of the practitioners. The use of albumin for HRS is not adapted to recommendations, which are not well known, suggesting that they should be more diffused.

Для цитирования: Garioud Armand, Cadranel Jean-François, Pauwels Arnaud, Nousbaum Jean-Baptiste, Thévenot Thierry, Dao Thong, Louvet Alexandre, Sogni Philippe, Talbodec Nathalie, Antonini Teresa M, Bureau Christophe, Thabut Dominique, Elkrief Laure, Jouannaud Vincent, Macaigne Gilles, Bernard-Chabert Brigitte, Lison Hortensia, Alric Laurent, Carbonell Nicolas, Labadie Héléne, Amiot Xavier, Abergel Armand, Hanslik Bertrand, Leroy Vincent, De Lédinghen Victor, Denis Jacques, Association Nationale des Hépato-gastroentérologues des Hôpitaux Généraux de France, Association Française pour l’Etude du Foie, Club de Réflexion des Cabinets et Groupes d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie. Albumin Use in Patients With Cirrhosis in France: Results of the "ALBU-LIVE" Survey: A Case for Better EASL Guidelines Diffusion and/or Revision.. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000735.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.