The Journal of heart valve disease · 2007
The influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on in-hospital complications and early mortality after aortic valve replacement.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nozohoor Shahab, Nilsson Johan, Lührs Carsten, Roijer Anders, Sjögren Johan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to analyze the relationship between patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and in-hospital complications and mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: AVR was performed in 1,819 patients between January 1996 and July 2006. Follow up investigations were performed after a mean of 4.3 years (range: 0 days to 10.6 years). Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate risk factors for in-hospital complications and mortality in patients with prosthesis mismatch. Actuarial statistics were used to calculate survival rates.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that PPM (defined as indexed effective orifice area < or = 0.85 cm2/m2) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological events (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.05-4.83, p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality between the PPM and non-PPM groups. Neither was any significant difference found between the two groups regarding long-term survival adjusted for significant risk factors for death after AVR.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest PPM to be an independent predictor of postoperative neurological complications in patients undergoing AVR. However, PPM did not negatively influence either short- or long-term survival. PPM may play an important role in selected categories of patients, and should be considered in order to avoid postoperative neurological complications.
METHODS: AVR was performed in 1,819 patients between January 1996 and July 2006. Follow up investigations were performed after a mean of 4.3 years (range: 0 days to 10.6 years). Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate risk factors for in-hospital complications and mortality in patients with prosthesis mismatch. Actuarial statistics were used to calculate survival rates.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that PPM (defined as indexed effective orifice area < or = 0.85 cm2/m2) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological events (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.05-4.83, p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality between the PPM and non-PPM groups. Neither was any significant difference found between the two groups regarding long-term survival adjusted for significant risk factors for death after AVR.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest PPM to be an independent predictor of postoperative neurological complications in patients undergoing AVR. However, PPM did not negatively influence either short- or long-term survival. PPM may play an important role in selected categories of patients, and should be considered in order to avoid postoperative neurological complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAtrial FibrillationFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Organ FailureMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeSweden