Brain communications · 2025
Different diseases, same circuits: lessons from rare and overlooked causes of disorders of consciousness.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Toker Daniel, Monti Martin M
Аннотация
Most foundational frameworks for understanding disorders of consciousness are based on common aetiologies such as traumatic brain injury, stroke or hypoxic-ischemic insult. From these, the mesocircuit hypothesis has emerged as a leading model, proposing that consciousness depends on a distributed network of brainstem arousal systems, central thalamic hubs and cortico-subcortical loops. However, rare and underrecognized causes of coma and prolonged disorders of consciousness offer a unique opportunity to test, refine and expand these models. In this review, we analyse a wide array of rare aetiologies-including genetic syndromes, parasitic and fungal infections, autoimmune encephalitides, amyloid and tau pathologies, toxic-metabolic states and haematological disorders-that are often excluded from mainstream consciousness research. Despite their diverse mechanisms, these conditions converge on a consistent set of anatomical targets: the central thalamus, brainstem reticular activating system, deep white matter 'bridging zones', basal ganglia and distributed cortical networks. This convergence not only provides powerful external validation of network-based frameworks such as the mesocircuit hypothesis but also underscores the clinical need for therapeutic approaches that address both aetiology-specific pathology and distributed circuit-level dysfunction. However, evidence quality varies considerably across these rare conditions, with many findings based on limited case reports or small series, necessitating cautious interpretation of proposed anatomical frameworks.