DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000002815
Assessment of Corneal Densitometry in Big-Bubble Dissection Versus Manual Dissection Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess corneal densitometry and visual outcomes after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (BB-DALK) and manual dissection deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.
METHODS
This retrospective comparative observational study included 40 keratoconic patients who underwent DALK surgery: 22 eyes had BB-DALK (group I) and 18 eyes had failed BB technique and DALK was completed by manual dissection (group II). Best -corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal topographic parameters, residual stromal tissue thickness, and endothelial cell count were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Densitometric analysis of different corneal layers and zones was performed using Scheimpflug tomography at each visit; values were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS
At 1 and 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was better in group I than in group II, but with no statistically significant difference. At 12 months, the visual acuities became nearly similar in both groups (0.30 ± 0.13 vs. 0.30 ± 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.888). Regarding corneal densitometric analysis, the recorded values for the posterior corneal layer were significantly higher in group II compared with group I at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively in the 0- to 2-mm zone (P < 0.001) and the 2- to 6-mm zone (P = 0.029, 0.028, 0.001, and <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Manual dissection DALK after failed BB technique may affect the interface stromal reflectivity up to 12 months postoperatively. However, this does not significantly affect the visual acuity in comparison with successful BB-DALK.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.