Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025
Recommendations for Interpreting Intraerythrocytic Tenofovir Diphosphate and Emtricitabine Triphosphate for HIV-1 Preexposure Prophylaxis Adherence Assessment.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Peter L, Coppinger Corwin, Cottrell Mackenzie L, Marzinke Mark A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intraerythrocytic tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) and emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) in dried blood spots (DBS) have emerged as a gold-standard approach to assess adherence for oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but several considerations are important for proper interpretation.
METHODS: Key articles were reviewed related to use of intraerythrocytic TFV-DP and FTC-TP for adherence assessment including studies of pharmacokinetics, analytical methodologies, and application to a variety of PrEP settings. Important considerations were identified that influence TFV-DP and FTC-TP adherence interpretations by ≥15% and guidance was provided to assist when these considerations arise.
RESULTS: Factors identified included pregnancy status, specific drug interactions, hematocrit outside of 35%-50%, laboratory methodology, use of tenofovir alafenamide vs tenofovir disoproxil, whether DBS was collected before TFV-DP reaching steady state, and daily versus event-driven PrEP. Recommendations were provided in the form of adherence interpretation tables or mathematical adjustments to account for these considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: Proper interpretation of TFV-DP and FTC-TP in DBS requires accounting for the factors identified above to maximize the value of these measurements.
METHODS: Key articles were reviewed related to use of intraerythrocytic TFV-DP and FTC-TP for adherence assessment including studies of pharmacokinetics, analytical methodologies, and application to a variety of PrEP settings. Important considerations were identified that influence TFV-DP and FTC-TP adherence interpretations by ≥15% and guidance was provided to assist when these considerations arise.
RESULTS: Factors identified included pregnancy status, specific drug interactions, hematocrit outside of 35%-50%, laboratory methodology, use of tenofovir alafenamide vs tenofovir disoproxil, whether DBS was collected before TFV-DP reaching steady state, and daily versus event-driven PrEP. Recommendations were provided in the form of adherence interpretation tables or mathematical adjustments to account for these considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: Proper interpretation of TFV-DP and FTC-TP in DBS requires accounting for the factors identified above to maximize the value of these measurements.