DOI 10.1097/ta.0b013e31829a2c43
Mechanical complications of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with trochanteric femoral nails.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The Trochanteric Fixation Nail System (TFN) was designed with a helical blade to improve resistance to cutout. We evaluated the incidence, modes, and predictors of failure for intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with this device.
METHODS
A retrospective review of 341 intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFN was conducted. Fractures were classified from the injury films using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and quality of reduction and hardware placement was evaluated on the initial postoperative films.
RESULTS
Two hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of mechanical complications was 20.5%. Twenty-one patients (9.4%) had excessive lateral migration of the helical blade (≥10 mm). Fifteen patients (6.7%) had blade migration in the head, including 7 patients (3.1%) with typical cutout and 8 patients (3.6%) with medial perforation without loss of reduction. Three patients (1.3%) sustained a femoral shaft fracture at the tip of the nail. The quality of calcar reduction was significantly predictive of all modes of failure (p < 0.05), except femoral shaft fracture at the nail tip.
CONCLUSION
The most common mechanical complication was lateral migration of the helical blade; however, this rarely led to a clinical problem. Medial migration of the blade in the head without loss of reduction was the second most frequent complication. We have identified a new complication associated with the TFN, that is, medial perforation without loss of reduction. Blade migration in the head was less frequent when blades were placed inferiorly with a tip-apex distance of at least 15 mm.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.