MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/add.15086

Медицинская библиотека · Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020

Cost-effectiveness of a specialist smoking cessation package compared with standard smoking cessation services for people with severe mental illness in England: a trial-based economic evaluation from the SCIMITAR+ study.

Li Jinshuo, Fairhurst Caroline, Peckham Emily, Bailey Della, Arundel Catherine, Hewitt Catherine, Heron Paul, Crosland Suzanne, Parrott Steve, Gilbody Simon, SCIMITAR+ collaborative

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a specialist smoking cessation package for people with severe mental illness

DESIGN

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective over a 12-month time horizon. Total costs, including smoking cessation, health-care and social services costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), derived from the five-level EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5 L), collected from a randomized controlled trial, were used as outcome measures. The bootstrap technique was employed to assess the uncertainty.

SETTING

Sixteen primary care and 21 secondary care mental health sites in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult smokers with bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia and related illnesses (n = 526).

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: A bespoke smoking cessation (BSC) package for people with severe mental illness offered up to 12 individual sessions with a mental health smoking cessation practitioner versus usual care (UC). Of the participants who were randomized, 261 were in UC group and 265 were in BSC group.

MEASUREMENTS: BSC intervention cost was estimated from the treatment log. Costs of UC, health-care and social services and EQ-5D-5 L were collected at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Incremental costs and incremental QLAYs were estimated using regression adjusting for respective baseline values and other baseline covariates.

FINDINGS: The mean total cost in the BSC group was £270 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -£1690 to £1424] lower than in the UC group, while the mean QALYs were 0.013 (95% CI = -0.008 to 0.045) higher, leading to BSC dominating UC (76% probability of cost-effective at £20 000/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS

A bespoke smoking cessation package for people with severe mental illness is likely to be cost-effective over 12 months compared with usual care provided by the UK's National Health Service and personal social services.

Для цитирования: Li Jinshuo, Fairhurst Caroline, Peckham Emily, Bailey Della, Arundel Catherine, Hewitt Catherine, Heron Paul, Crosland Suzanne, Parrott Steve, Gilbody Simon, SCIMITAR+ collaborative. Cost-effectiveness of a specialist smoking cessation package compared with standard smoking cessation services for people with severe mental illness in England: a trial-based economic evaluation from the SCIMITAR+ study.. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2020. DOI: 10.1111/add.15086.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.