DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0330162
Invasive candidiasis following lung transplant: An Assessment of impact utilizing a national insurance claims cohort.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are susceptible to invasive candidiasis (IC). This study aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and impact of IC on mortality in LTRs using a national insurance claims cohort.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. We identified LTRs from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2023, using procedural codes. Exclusion criteria included re-transplantations and pre-transplant IC. We employed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors for IC and Cox Proportional Hazard models to assess the impact of IC on mortality.
RESULTS
Among 1279 LTRs, 131 (10.2%) developed IC, primarily during the initial hospitalization for lung transplantation (index hospitalization). The median time to IC diagnosis was 32.0 days following transplant. Post-transplant extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for more than 8 days was associated with IC (OR: 2.34; 95% CI 1.03 to 5.34). Mortality was higher in LTRs with IC (HR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.45 to 3.67; p < 0.001). LTRs with IC also had longer hospital stays (median 26.0 days vs. 20.0 days; p < 0.001) and more re-operations (36.7% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.003) compared to those without IC.
CONCLUSION
Invasive candidiasis affects approximately 10% of lung transplant recipients, most often during the initial hospitalization. It is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and a greater need for surgical re-intervention. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and targeted preventive strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.