MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.02.013

Медицинская библиотека · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2018

Impact of ticagrelor and aspirin versus clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic patients with peripheral arterial disease: Thrombus burden assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Yang Xiao, Leesar Massoud A, Ahmed Hinan, Lendel Vasili, Rodriguez Gerardo, Mutlu Deniz, Cawich Ian, Prasad Anand, Oglesby Meagan, Marmagkiolis Kostas, Phillips Nathanael E, Jouke Dijkstra, Michalek Joel, Liu Qianqian, Milner Thomas, McElroy Austin, Hoyt Taylor, Feldman Marc D, Cilingiroglu Mehmet

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare OCT identified white thrombus decline, neointimal hyperplasia and clinical outcomes of patients treated with ticagrelor plus aspirin with those patients treated with clopidogrel plus aspirin after peripheral interventions.

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is a potent platelet inhibitor. In patients with coronary artery disease, ticagrelor and aspirin demonstrated reduced rates of stent thrombosis, compared to aspirin and clopidogrel. The clinical importance of potent antiplatelet inhibition after peripheral endovascular interventions is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 18 patients with superficial femoral artery disease and the presence of OCT-detected clot post-stent placement. Patients were randomized to 75 mg clopidogrel once daily for 1 month vs. 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 6 months, both in addition to 81 mg aspirin for 6 months. Clot volumes, ankle-brachial index (ABI), 6-minute walk test, and Rutherford classification were measured at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Neointimal hyperplasia and neovascularization were calculated at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

N = 11 patients were enrolled in the clopidogrel group and N = 7 in the ticagrelor group. There was a significantly greater decrease in white thrombus in the ticagrelor group (median volume/stent length (0.067 vs 0.014 mm3/mm, p = 0.05)). No differences were found in % neointima (0.412 vs 0.536 mm3/mm, p = 0.44) and neovascularization (28 vs 44, p = 0.16). ABI and Rutherford classification were improved significantly after 6 months in the clopidogrel group, with no difference between groups at 6 months in ABI or Rutherford.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients with PAD, ticagrelor showed significant improvement relative to clopidogrel with respect to white thrombus burden decline.

Для цитирования: Yang Xiao, Leesar Massoud A, Ahmed Hinan, Lendel Vasili, Rodriguez Gerardo, Mutlu Deniz, Cawich Ian, Prasad Anand, Oglesby Meagan, Marmagkiolis Kostas, Phillips Nathanael E, Jouke Dijkstra, Michalek Joel, Liu Qianqian, Milner Thomas, McElroy Austin, Hoyt Taylor, Feldman Marc D, Cilingiroglu Mehmet. Impact of ticagrelor and aspirin versus clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic patients with peripheral arterial disease: Thrombus burden assessed by optical coherence tomography.. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.02.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.