Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2022
Periodontal status and whole salivary adipokines after scaling and root planing with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in obese patients with periodontitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdellatif Hoda M, Ali Dena, Divakar Darshan D, BinShabaib Munerah S, ALHarthi Shatha S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Whole-salivary (WS) adiponectin and leptin levels after scaling and root planing (SRP) with and without antimicrobial-photodynamic-therapy (aPDT) in obese and normal-weight individuals with periodontitis remain uninvestigated. This study compared the effect of SRP without and with adjuvant aPDT on periodontal status and WS leptin and adiponectin levels (LAL) in obese patients with periodontitis.
METHODS: Groups 1 and 2 entailed obese patients without and with periodontitis. Groups 3 and 4 had normal weight individuals without and with periodontitis. Therapeutically, individuals with periodontitis were categorized into test- (SRP+aPDT) and control- (SRP alone) subgroups. All patients without periodontitis underwent routine dental prophylaxis. Clinical attachment loss (AL), gingival and plaque index (GI and PI), probing depth (PD), missing teeth (MT) and WS LAL were measured at baseline and at three months of follow-up. P<5% were graded statistically significant.
RESULTS: At baseline, clinicoradiographic variables were significantly higher among patients in test- and control-groups in groups 1 (P<0.01) and 3 (P<0.01) versus 2 and 4. In group 2 and 3, LL were significantly high at baseline compared with follow-up (P<0.01). There was no difference in periodontal parameters and WS adiponectin and LL in the test and control-groups at of follow-up. No correlation existed between salivary LAL and clinical periodontal parameters (PI, GI, PD and clinical AL). No correlation existed between age, gender and BMI and WS LAL.
CONCLUSION: In the short-term, SRP with or without aPDT is ineffective in the treatment of periodontitis in obese patients with periodontitis.
METHODS: Groups 1 and 2 entailed obese patients without and with periodontitis. Groups 3 and 4 had normal weight individuals without and with periodontitis. Therapeutically, individuals with periodontitis were categorized into test- (SRP+aPDT) and control- (SRP alone) subgroups. All patients without periodontitis underwent routine dental prophylaxis. Clinical attachment loss (AL), gingival and plaque index (GI and PI), probing depth (PD), missing teeth (MT) and WS LAL were measured at baseline and at three months of follow-up. P<5% were graded statistically significant.
RESULTS: At baseline, clinicoradiographic variables were significantly higher among patients in test- and control-groups in groups 1 (P<0.01) and 3 (P<0.01) versus 2 and 4. In group 2 and 3, LL were significantly high at baseline compared with follow-up (P<0.01). There was no difference in periodontal parameters and WS adiponectin and LL in the test and control-groups at of follow-up. No correlation existed between salivary LAL and clinical periodontal parameters (PI, GI, PD and clinical AL). No correlation existed between age, gender and BMI and WS LAL.
CONCLUSION: In the short-term, SRP with or without aPDT is ineffective in the treatment of periodontitis in obese patients with periodontitis.