MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.006

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2017

The puzzling question of inhibitory control in Tourette syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Morand-Beaulieu Simon, Grot Stéphanie, Lavoie Jacob, Leclerc Julie B, Luck David, Lavoie Marc E

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder involving motor and phonic tics. Inhibitory control is a key issue in TS, and many disruptive or impulsive behaviors might arise from inhibitory deficits. However, conflicting findings regarding TS patients' inhibitory performance in neuropsychological tasks have been reported throughout the literature. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate inhibitory control through neuropsychological tasks, and to analyze the factors modulating inhibitory deficits. To this end, a literature search was performed through MEDLINE and PsycINFO, to retrieve studies including neuropsychological tasks that assessed inhibitory control in TS patients. Of the 4020 studies identified, 61 were included in the meta-analysis, for a total of 1717 TS patients. Our analyses revealed a small to medium effect in favor of inhibitory deficits in TS patients. This effect was larger in TS+ADHD patients, but pure TS patients also showed some inhibitory deficits. Therefore, deficits in inhibitory control seem to be an inherent component of TS, and are exacerbated when ADHD is concomitant.

Для цитирования: Morand-Beaulieu Simon, Grot Stéphanie, Lavoie Jacob, Leclerc Julie B, Luck David, Lavoie Marc E. The puzzling question of inhibitory control in Tourette syndrome: A meta-analysis.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.