MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/cyto.b.20176

Медицинская библиотека · Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2007

Assessing immunophenotyping performance: proficiency-validation for adopting improved flow cytometry methods.

Hultin Lance E, Menendez Frederick A, Hultin Patricia M, Jamieson Beth D, O'Gorman Maurice R G, Borowski Luann, Matud Jose L, Denny Thomas N, Margolick Joseph B

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The continuous improvement and evolution of immune cell phenotyping requires periodic upgrading of laboratory methods and technology. Flow cytometry laboratories that are participating in research protocols sponsored by the NIAID are required to perform "switch" studies to validate performance before methods for T-cell subset analysis can be changed.

METHODS

Switch studies were conducted among the four flow cytometry laboratories of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), comparing a 2-color, lyse-wash method and a newer, 3-color, lyse no-wash method. Two of the laboratories twice failed to satisfy the criteria for acceptable differences from the previous method. Rather than repeating more switch studies, these laboratories were allowed to adopt the 3-color, lyse no-wash method. To evaluate the impact of the switch to the new method at these two sites, their results with the new method were evaluated within the context of all laboratories participating in the NIH-NIAID-Division of AIDS Immunology Quality Assurance (IQA) proficiency-testing program.

RESULTS

Laboratory performance at these two sites substantially improved relative to the IQA standard test results. Variation across the four MACS sites and across replicate samples was also reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Although switch studies are the conventional method for assessing comparability of laboratory methods, two alternatives to the requirement of repeating failed switch studies should be considered: (1) test the new method and assess performance on the proficiency testing reference panel, and (2) prior to adoption of the new methods, use both the old and the new method on the reference panel samples and demonstrate that performance with the new method is better according to standard statistical procedures. These alternatives may help some laboratories' transition to a new and superior methodology more quickly than if they are required to attempt multiple, serial switch studies.

Для цитирования: Hultin Lance E, Menendez Frederick A, Hultin Patricia M, Jamieson Beth D, O'Gorman Maurice R G, Borowski Luann, Matud Jose L, Denny Thomas N, Margolick Joseph B. Assessing immunophenotyping performance: proficiency-validation for adopting improved flow cytometry methods.. Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20176.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.