Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
Treatment Outcomes of Total Versus Superficial Parotidectomy With Postoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Parotid Carcinoma Confined to the Superficial Lobe: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Samuckkeethum Wisarut, Muenkaew Yosita, Ratanaprasert Narin, Supakmontri Thanapat, Ariyanon Tapanut, Naruekon Jakkree, Supanimitjaroenporn Pasawat, Iamsahakiat Wirut, Kerr Stephen J, Snidvongs Kornkiat
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical management of high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe remains controversial, with limited evidence comparing total and superficial parotidectomy in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes and complications between total parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (TP + PORT) and superficial parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (SP + PORT).
STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Adult patients (> 18 years) with high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe treated between 2011 and 2023 were identified at tertiary centres. Exclusion criteria included preoperative facial nerve palsy, metastatic disease to the parotid gland, prior head and neck radiotherapy, receipt of concurrent chemoradiation and follow-up < 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included (TP + PORT, n = 63; SP + PORT, n = 45) with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for older age and a higher proportion of Milan category VI cytology in the TP + PORT group (p < 0.05). Local, regional and distant recurrence rates and mortality did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.55, 0.26, 1.00 and 0.36, respectively). All local recurrences occurred within 24 months (mean: 7.2 months). Age and positive resection margins were independent predictors of mortality (p < 0.01). Five-year overall survival was 73.0% in the TP + PORT group and 81.5% in the SP + PORT group. IPTW-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in recurrence or mortality between groups (hazard ratio for mortality, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.32-1.90; p = 0.59). Permanent facial nerve palsy was significantly more common after TP + PORT (14.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), while other complications were similar.
CONCLUSION: Superficial parotidectomy with adequate margins followed by PORT achieves comparable oncologic outcomes with significantly fewer complications and may be preferred for high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d (JBI).
OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes and complications between total parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (TP + PORT) and superficial parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (SP + PORT).
STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Adult patients (> 18 years) with high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe treated between 2011 and 2023 were identified at tertiary centres. Exclusion criteria included preoperative facial nerve palsy, metastatic disease to the parotid gland, prior head and neck radiotherapy, receipt of concurrent chemoradiation and follow-up < 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included (TP + PORT, n = 63; SP + PORT, n = 45) with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for older age and a higher proportion of Milan category VI cytology in the TP + PORT group (p < 0.05). Local, regional and distant recurrence rates and mortality did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.55, 0.26, 1.00 and 0.36, respectively). All local recurrences occurred within 24 months (mean: 7.2 months). Age and positive resection margins were independent predictors of mortality (p < 0.01). Five-year overall survival was 73.0% in the TP + PORT group and 81.5% in the SP + PORT group. IPTW-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in recurrence or mortality between groups (hazard ratio for mortality, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.32-1.90; p = 0.59). Permanent facial nerve palsy was significantly more common after TP + PORT (14.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), while other complications were similar.
CONCLUSION: Superficial parotidectomy with adequate margins followed by PORT achieves comparable oncologic outcomes with significantly fewer complications and may be preferred for high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d (JBI).