The British journal of dermatology · 2016
Bullous pemphigoid and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors: a case-noncase study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Béné J, Moulis G, Bennani I, Auffret M, Coupe P, Babai S, Hillaire-Buys D, Micallef J, Gautier S, French Association of Regional PharmacoVigilance Centres
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV have been suspected in the onset of bullous pemphigoid for several years now. However, comparative studies assessing the link between DPP-IV inhibitor exposure and bullous pemphigoid have not yet been performed.
OBJECTIVES: To detect, from the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD), a signal of risk of bullous pemphigoid during DPP-IV inhibitor exposure by comparative study.
METHODS: All spontaneous reports of DPP-IV inhibitor-related bullous pemphigoid recorded in the FPVD between April 2008 and August 2014 were described. We conducted disproportionality analyses (case-noncase method) to assess the link between DPP-IV inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid, calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs). We also compared DPP-IV inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid reports rated per million defined daily doses dispensed during the study period.
RESULTS: Among 217 331 spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports registered in the FPVD, 1297 involved DPP-IV inhibitors. Among these observations, 42 were bullous pemphigoid (vildagliptin, n = 31; sitagliptin, n = 10; saxagliptin, n = 1). The ROR for pooled DPP-IV inhibitors was 67·5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 47·1-96·9]. Disproportionality was also observed for each DPP-IV inhibitor: vildagliptin (ROR 225·3, 95% CI 148·9-340·9), sitagliptin (ROR 17·0, 95% CI 8·9-32·5) and saxagliptin (ROR 16·5, 95% CI 2·3-119·1). Analyses adjusted on dispensing data led to similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm a strong signal for an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid during DPP-IV inhibitor exposure. This adverse drug reaction is observed for each DPP-IV inhibitor, suggesting a class effect. The signal was higher with vildagliptin than with the other DPP-IV inhibitors.
OBJECTIVES: To detect, from the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD), a signal of risk of bullous pemphigoid during DPP-IV inhibitor exposure by comparative study.
METHODS: All spontaneous reports of DPP-IV inhibitor-related bullous pemphigoid recorded in the FPVD between April 2008 and August 2014 were described. We conducted disproportionality analyses (case-noncase method) to assess the link between DPP-IV inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid, calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs). We also compared DPP-IV inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid reports rated per million defined daily doses dispensed during the study period.
RESULTS: Among 217 331 spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports registered in the FPVD, 1297 involved DPP-IV inhibitors. Among these observations, 42 were bullous pemphigoid (vildagliptin, n = 31; sitagliptin, n = 10; saxagliptin, n = 1). The ROR for pooled DPP-IV inhibitors was 67·5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 47·1-96·9]. Disproportionality was also observed for each DPP-IV inhibitor: vildagliptin (ROR 225·3, 95% CI 148·9-340·9), sitagliptin (ROR 17·0, 95% CI 8·9-32·5) and saxagliptin (ROR 16·5, 95% CI 2·3-119·1). Analyses adjusted on dispensing data led to similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm a strong signal for an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid during DPP-IV inhibitor exposure. This adverse drug reaction is observed for each DPP-IV inhibitor, suggesting a class effect. The signal was higher with vildagliptin than with the other DPP-IV inhibitors.