MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ced.12831

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2016

Current practice in treatment approach for bullous pemphigoid: comparison between national surveys from the Netherlands and the UK.

Meijer J M, Jonkman M F, Wojnarowska F, Wiliams H C, Kirtschig G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Treatment approaches for bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common autoimmune skin blistering disease, are largely based on national and international guidelines. We conducted a national survey among dermatologists in the Netherlands to explore the current treatment of BP, and compared the results with those of a previously published survey from the UK. Almost all responders in the Netherlands (n = 175) used very potent topical corticosteroids, both as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy. In contrast to UK dermatologists, the majority recommended whole-body application rather than local application to lesions. Systemic antibiotics were used by > 70% of responders. Half of the responders in the Netherlands considered systemic steroids the first-choice treatment, with the majority also using adjunctive therapy as a routine. Despite many similarities in treatment approach between the two countries, these surveys provide an important insight into the gap between actual and recommended practice at a country level in relation to the best external evidence.

Для цитирования: Meijer J M, Jonkman M F, Wojnarowska F, Wiliams H C, Kirtschig G. Current practice in treatment approach for bullous pemphigoid: comparison between national surveys from the Netherlands and the UK.. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/ced.12831.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.