MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12325-018-0665-5

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in therapy · 2018

Causality Assessment of Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction Associated with Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate: Application of the Bradford Hill Criteria.

Muganurmath Chandrashekhar S, Curry Amy L, Schindzielorz Andrew H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Causality assessment is crucial to post-marketing pharmacovigilance and helps optimize safe and appropriate use of medicines by patients in the real world. Self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction are common in the general population as well as in patients with allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. Intranasal corticosteroids, including intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP), are amongst the most effective drugs indicated in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. While intranasal corticosteroids are associated with olfactory and gustatory dysfunction and are currently labeled for these adverse events, causality assessment has not been performed to date. Although there is no single widely accepted method to assess causality in pharmacovigilance, the Bradford Hill criteria offer a robust and comprehensive approach because nine distinct aspects of an observed potential drug-event association are assessed. In this literature-based narrative review, Hill's criteria were applied to determine causal inference between INFP and olfactory and gustatory dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Muganurmath Chandrashekhar S, Curry Amy L, Schindzielorz Andrew H. Causality Assessment of Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction Associated with Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate: Application of the Bradford Hill Criteria.. Advances in therapy. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0665-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.