MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ede.0000000000001892

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025

Disaggregating Health Differences and Disparities With Machine Learning and Observed-to-expected Ratios: Application to Major Lower Limb Amputation.

Strassle Paula D, Minc Samantha D, Kalbaugh Corey A, Donneyong Macarius M, Ko Jamie S, McGinigle Katharine L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Major lower limb amputation is a devastating but preventable complication of peripheral artery disease. It is unclear whether racial and ethnic and rural differences in amputation rates are due to clinical, hospital, or structural factors.

METHODS

We included all peripheral artery disease hospitalizations of patients ≥40 years old between 2017 and 2019 in Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Mississippi, or New York (HCUP State Inpatient Databases). We estimated the expected number of amputations using three models: (1) unadjusted, (2) adjusted for clinical factors, and (3) adjusted for clinical factors, hospital factors, and social determinants of health using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). We calculated and compared observed-to-expected ratios and quantified the role of these factors in amputation rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,577,061 hospitalizations (990,152 unique patients) and 21,233 major lower limb amputations (1.4%) were included. After accounting for clinical differences, we observed amputation disparities among rural Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White patients and nonrural Black and Native American patients. After accounting for hospital factors and social determinants of health, disparities were no longer present among rural White adults (0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 1.09); however, disparities persisted among rural Black (1.26, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.51), Hispanic (1.50, 95% CI: 0.89, 2.12), and Native American patients (1.13, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.58) and nonrural Black (1.12, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.15) and Native American (1.15, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.44) patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinical factors did not fully explain differences in amputation rates, and hospital factors and social determinants of health did not fully explain disparities. These findings provide additional evidence that implicit bias is associated with amputation disparities.

Для цитирования: Strassle Paula D, Minc Samantha D, Kalbaugh Corey A, Donneyong Macarius M, Ko Jamie S, McGinigle Katharine L. Disaggregating Health Differences and Disparities With Machine Learning and Observed-to-expected Ratios: Application to Major Lower Limb Amputation.. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001892.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.