DOI 10.3390/antibiotics14080747
Simplifying Antibiotic Management of Peritonitis in APD: Evidence from a Non-Inferiority Randomized Trial.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/
OBJECTIVE
Peritonitis remains a serious complication in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), requiring prompt and effective antibiotic administration. This study evaluated whether delivering antibiotics directly through APD bags is as effective as administering them via an additional manual daytime exchange.
METHODS
We conducted a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial involving patients diagnosed with peritonitis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive Ceftazidime and Vancomycin, either via APD bags or through a combined approach of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) plus APD. A total of 64 patients (32 per group) were enrolled, with comparable baseline demographic and clinical profiles, including laboratory markers of infection severity and dialysis history.
RESULTS
Peritonitis resolved in 90.6% of the patients treated via APD bags and in 81.3% of those receiving antibiotics through manual exchange plus APD. Although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.281), the observed absolute difference of 9.3% was well within the predefined non-inferiority margin of 30%, supporting the clinical non-inferiority of the APD-only method. The mean time to resolution was similar between groups (p = 0.593). Post hoc power analyses indicated limited statistical power (18.5% for the resolution rate and 9.2% for time to resolution), suggesting that modest differences may not have been detectable given the sample size. Nevertheless, the high resolution rates observed in both groups reflect valid and encouraging clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Antibiotic administration via APD bags demonstrated comparable clinical effectiveness to the combined manual exchange plus APD method for treating peritonitis. Given its operational simplicity and favorable results, the APD-only strategy may offer a pragmatic alternative in routine care. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm these findings and optimize treatment protocols.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04077996.
FUNDING SOURCE: None to declare.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.