MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1603392

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025

Review of research progress in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

Nian Wanning, Tao Weichen, Zhang Haiyi

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SAAKI) poses a significant challenge in critical care medicine, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates and often leading to chronic kidney disease (CKD). This article provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic advancements, therapeutic strategies, and prognostic studies of SAAKI. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, research has shifted from the traditional renal ischemia-centric view to a multidimensional interplay involving microcirculatory disturbances, immune metabolic disorders, and programmed cell death. Regarding diagnosis, traditional Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria exhibit limitations, whereas novel biomarkers and imaging techniques offer new avenues for early diagnosis. Therapeutic strategies encompass early intervention, hemodynamic management, renal replacement therapy, and targeted therapies; however, controversy persists regarding the optimal timing and methods of their initiation. Prognostic studies focus on the mechanisms underlying the transition from SAAKI to CKD and corresponding preventive strategies. Future research should bridge the gap between animal models and human pathology and explore the potential of multi-omics technologies and artificial intelligence in optimizing management.

Для цитирования: Nian Wanning, Tao Weichen, Zhang Haiyi. Review of research progress in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.. Frontiers in molecular biosciences. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1603392.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.