The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
MemScreen: A smartphone application for detection of mild cognitive impairment: A validation study: Smartphone App for MCI Detection.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dumurgier Julien, Paquet Claire, Hugon Jacques, Planche Vincent, Gaubert Sinead, Epelbaum Stéphane, Bombois Stéphanie, Teichmann Marc, Levy Richard, Baudouin Estelle, Vrillon Agathe, Hourrègue Claire, Cognat Emmanuel, Sabia Séverine, Singh-Manoux Archana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary care is often the first point of contact for patients with cognitive complaints, making initial cognitive screening an essential step to avoid delays in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early stage. We developed MemScreen, a self-administered smartphone application that assesses overall cognition and verbal memory, and evaluated its ability to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both general and clinical populations.
METHODS: We conducted two validation cohort studies: (1) UK-based Whitehall II cohort study (13th wave, 2018-2022) involving a general population (MCI defined by poor performance on a global cognitive score), and (2) five French memory clinics involving patients without dementia (amnestic MCI defined by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test). MemScreen, MMSE, and TMT-A effectiveness was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In Whitehall II (n = 2118, mean age 75.9 years, 23.9 % women, 14.5 % MCI), median MemScreen completion time was 4 min 18 s. MemScreen had the highest AUC (0.87; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.89) for distinguishing MCI, outperforming MMSE (AUC = 0.79; 0.76-0.82; p = 0.018) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.77; 0.74-0.80; p = 0.023). MemScreen sensitivity and specificity were 78.6 % and 78.7 %, respectively. In memory clinics (n = 303, mean age 70.5 years, 53 % women, 46.9 % amnestic MCI), median completion time was 5 min 17 s. MemScreen showed superior performance (AUC = 0.87; 0.83-0.91) compared to MMSE (AUC = 0.72; 0.67-0.78; p < 0.001) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.63; 0.56-0.69; p < 0.001), with 93.0 % sensitivity and 54.0 % specificity for amnestic MCI.
DISCUSSION: MemScreen outperformed traditional tests in identifying MCI in both general and clinical populations. Its self-administration and short completion time suggest potential as an effective screening tool to optimize memory clinic referrals for AD diagnosis and treatment.
METHODS: We conducted two validation cohort studies: (1) UK-based Whitehall II cohort study (13th wave, 2018-2022) involving a general population (MCI defined by poor performance on a global cognitive score), and (2) five French memory clinics involving patients without dementia (amnestic MCI defined by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test). MemScreen, MMSE, and TMT-A effectiveness was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In Whitehall II (n = 2118, mean age 75.9 years, 23.9 % women, 14.5 % MCI), median MemScreen completion time was 4 min 18 s. MemScreen had the highest AUC (0.87; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.89) for distinguishing MCI, outperforming MMSE (AUC = 0.79; 0.76-0.82; p = 0.018) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.77; 0.74-0.80; p = 0.023). MemScreen sensitivity and specificity were 78.6 % and 78.7 %, respectively. In memory clinics (n = 303, mean age 70.5 years, 53 % women, 46.9 % amnestic MCI), median completion time was 5 min 17 s. MemScreen showed superior performance (AUC = 0.87; 0.83-0.91) compared to MMSE (AUC = 0.72; 0.67-0.78; p < 0.001) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.63; 0.56-0.69; p < 0.001), with 93.0 % sensitivity and 54.0 % specificity for amnestic MCI.
DISCUSSION: MemScreen outperformed traditional tests in identifying MCI in both general and clinical populations. Its self-administration and short completion time suggest potential as an effective screening tool to optimize memory clinic referrals for AD diagnosis and treatment.