MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.09.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · 2020

Cytological interpretation of p16 immunohistochemistry in head and neck carcinomas: does the choice of fixative matter?

Gargano Stacey M, Sebastiano Christopher, Mardekian Jack, Solomides Charalambos C, HooKim Kim

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nodal metastases plays a key role in the diagnosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Because of significant clinical implications of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related OPSCC, immunohistochemistry for p16 as a surrogate marker for high-risk HPV is an important ancillary test. After our laboratory switched from CytoLyt to formalin fixative for FNA needle rinses generating cell block (CB) material, we investigated the impact of this protocol change on the accuracy of p16 results.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

FNA specimens of head and neck lesions with p16 staining performed on CB, from 1 year before and after the implementation of formalin-fixed CB (FCB) were identified. Nuclear and cytoplasmic p16 expression was scored and compared to p16 status on corresponding surgical specimens.

RESULTS

There were no false-positive results with either fixative. CytoLyt-fixed CB (CCB) had 47% (7 of 15) false-negative cases, whereas FCB had none, with 100% diagnostic accuracy for p16-negative (n = 6) and p16-positive (n = 15) results. False-negative CCB showed 0% to 10% nuclear and 0% to 65% weak cytoplasmic staining, whereas true-positive CCB showed 10% to 85% nuclear and 35% to 90% cytoplasmic staining. p16-negative FCB showed 0% nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, and p16-positive FCB showed 30% to 100% moderate-strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Interobserver variability was greater with CCB.

CONCLUSIONS

In our laboratory, formalin fixation of CB material improved the accuracy of p16 interpretation. Staining in FCB was also more robust than CCB, which showed weaker cytoplasmic and more focal nuclear staining. Therefore, we advocate formalin fixation for head and neck cytology specimens that may require p16 testing.

Для цитирования: Gargano Stacey M, Sebastiano Christopher, Mardekian Jack, Solomides Charalambos C, HooKim Kim. Cytological interpretation of p16 immunohistochemistry in head and neck carcinomas: does the choice of fixative matter?. Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.09.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.