Cerebellar Necrosectomy Instead of Suboccipital Decompression: A Suitable Alternative for Patients with Space-Occupying Cerebellar Infarction.

OBJECTIVE

Space-occupying cerebellar ischemic strokes (SOCSs) often lead to neurological deterioration and require surgical intervention to release pressure from the posterior fossa. Current guidelines recommend suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) with dural expansion when medical therapy is not sufficient. However, no good-quality evidence is available to support this surgical practice, and the surgical timing and technique both remain controversial. We have described an alternative to SDC, surgical evacuation of infarcted tissue (necrosectomy) and its clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In the present retrospective, single-center study, 34 consecutive patients with SOCS undergoing necrosectomy via osteoplastic craniotomy were included. The patient characteristics and radiological findings were evaluated. To differentiate the effects of age on the functional outcomes, the patients were divided into 2 groups (group I, age ≤60 years; and group II, age >60 years). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale, modified Rankin scale, and Barthel index at discharge and 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

In our cohort, we observed overall mortality of 21%, with good functional outcomes (Glasgow outcome scale score ≥4) for 76% of the patients. No statistically significant differences in mortality or functional outcomes were observed between the 2 patient groups. Comparing our data with a recent meta-analysis of SDC, the number of adverse events and unfavorable outcome showed equipoise between the 2 treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Necrosectomy appears to be a suitable alternative to SDC for SOCS, achieving comparable mortality and functional outcomes. Further trials are necessary to evaluate which surgical technique is more beneficial in the setting of SOCSs.