MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/aas.14317

Медицинская библиотека · Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2023

A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Aslam Tayyba N, Klitgaard Thomas L, Ahlstedt Christian A O, Andersen Finn H, Chew Michelle S, Collet Marie O, Cronhjort Maria, Estrup Stine, Fossum Ole K, Frisvold Shirin K, Gillmann Hans-Joerg, Granholm Anders, Gundem Trine M, Hauss Kristin, Hollenberg Jacob, Huanca Condori Maria E, Hästbacka Johanna, Johnstad Bror A, Keus Eric, Kjaer Maj-Brit N, Klepstad Pål, Krag Mette, Kvåle Reidar, Malbrain Manu L N G, Meyhoff Christian S, Morgan Matt, Møller Anders, Pfortmueller Carmen A, Poulsen Lone M, Robertson Andrew C, Schefold Joerg C, Schjørring Olav L, Siegemund Martin, Sigurdsson Martin I, Sjövall Fredrik, Strand Kristian, Stueber Thomas, Szczeklik Wojciech, Wahlin Rebecka R, Wangberg Helge L, Wian Karl-Andre, Wichmann Sine, Hofsø Kristin, Møller Morten H, Perner Anders, Rasmussen Bodil S, Laake Jon H, SVALBARD investigators

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.

METHODS

We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.

CONCLUSIONS

The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.

Для цитирования: Aslam Tayyba N, Klitgaard Thomas L, Ahlstedt Christian A O, Andersen Finn H, Chew Michelle S, Collet Marie O, Cronhjort Maria, Estrup Stine, Fossum Ole K, Frisvold Shirin K, Gillmann Hans-Joerg, Granholm Anders, Gundem Trine M, Hauss Kristin, Hollenberg Jacob, Huanca Condori Maria E, Hästbacka Johanna, Johnstad Bror A, Keus Eric, Kjaer Maj-Brit N, Klepstad Pål, Krag Mette, Kvåle Reidar, Malbrain Manu L N G, Meyhoff Christian S, Morgan Matt, Møller Anders, Pfortmueller Carmen A, Poulsen Lone M, Robertson Andrew C, Schefold Joerg C, Schjørring Olav L, Siegemund Martin, Sigurdsson Martin I, Sjövall Fredrik, Strand Kristian, Stueber Thomas, Szczeklik Wojciech, Wahlin Rebecka R, Wangberg Helge L, Wian Karl-Andre, Wichmann Sine, Hofsø Kristin, Møller Morten H, Perner Anders, Rasmussen Bodil S, Laake Jon H, SVALBARD investigators. A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/aas.14317.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.