MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111925

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2026

Young onset rectal cancer (YORC): a descriptive tertiary center analysis.

Schraepen Cédric, Rasschaert Gertjan, Maerten Pieter, Bislenghi Gabriele, De Hertogh Gert, Debrun Lynn, Dresen Raphaëla, Leclercq Philippe, Sagaert Xavier, Tejpar Sabine, Van Herpe Filip, Dekervel Jeroen, Haustermans Karin, Van Cutsem Eric, Coeckelberghs Ellen, D'Hoore André, Wolthuis Albert

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults under 50 is increasing worldwide, with young-onset rectal cancer (YORC) projected to represent up to 25% of rectal cancers by 2030. This study compared clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and staging between YORC and late-onset rectal cancer (LORC) in a tertiary referral center. The primary objective was to assess differences in baseline disease stage, with secondary outcomes including short-term oncological endpoints.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2017 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and classified as YORC (<50 years) or LORC (≥50 years). Clinical, pathological, and radiologic staging features were compared. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemistry, with MSI testing for MMR-deficient tumors. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic patients were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median potential follow-up was estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 705 patients, 86 (12.2%) were YORC and 619 (87.8%) LORC. YORC patients more often presented with symptoms (91.9% vs 70.9%; p < 0.001), had better WHO performance status (score 0: 98.8% vs 82.5%; p = 0.002), and more frequently showed dMMR/MSI tumors (7.0% vs 1.3%; p = 0.001). Younger patients had higher rates of metastatic disease (22.1% vs 11.6%; p = 0.007), lymph-node involvement (73.8% vs 60.7%; p = 0.020), and extramural vascular invasion (40.1% vs 26.0%; p = 0.004), with no significant differences in T-stage or mesorectal fascia involvement. At the first MDT, YORC patients were more often selected for total neoadjuvant therapy or chemotherapy alone. Among non-metastatic patients, 3-year OS (93.6% vs 87.1%; p = 0.259) and DFS (77.8% vs 77.2%; p = 0.923) was not statistically different with a median potential follow-up of 3.85 years.

CONCLUSION

YORC presents more often with symptoms and advanced disease (M+, N+, EMVI+), yet short-term survival in non-metastatic patients tended to parallel that of older individuals. These findings underscore the need for earlier diagnosis, tailored management, and increased clinical awareness.

Для цитирования: Schraepen Cédric, Rasschaert Gertjan, Maerten Pieter, Bislenghi Gabriele, De Hertogh Gert, Debrun Lynn, Dresen Raphaëla, Leclercq Philippe, Sagaert Xavier, Tejpar Sabine, Van Herpe Filip, Dekervel Jeroen, Haustermans Karin, Van Cutsem Eric, Coeckelberghs Ellen, D'Hoore André, Wolthuis Albert. Young onset rectal cancer (YORC): a descriptive tertiary center analysis.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111925.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.