Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
Correlation of tumor maximum standardized uptake value from 18F-BPA PET and boron neutron capture therapy tumor dose with treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer: a retrospective analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshino Yuki, Takeno Satoshi, Aihara Teruhito, Isohashi Kayako, Hu Naonori, Kanai Yasukazu, Sasaki Akinori, Nojiri Mai, Terada Tetsuya, Haginomori Shinichi, Nihei Keiji, Ono Koji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) dose planning conventionally uses a tumor-to-blood (T/B) ratio derived from the tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of fluorine-18-labeled 4-borono-L-phenylalanine (1⁸F-BPA) positron emission tomography (PET) (individual model). It remains unclear whether tumor SUVmax or individual model doses predict outcomes in accelerator-based BNCT for head and neck cancer (HNC). We investigated the correlation of 1⁸F-BPA PET SUVmax and individual model doses with treatment response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with HNC treated with accelerator-based BNCT (2020-2021). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Dose parameters (Dmax, Dmin, and D80%) were calculated using the uniform model (T/B = 2.5) and the individual model (T/B = Tumor SUVmax/Blood-pool SUV). Correlations between tumor SUVmax or dose parameters and best treatment response [complete response (CR) vs. non-CR] were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The objective response rate was 90%, and the CR rate was 50%. CR status strongly predicted superior 2 years overall survival, locoregional control, and progression-free survival (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the CR and non-CR groups for tumor SUVmax, uniform model doses, or individual model doses (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: 1⁸F-BPA PET SUVmax and the conventional individual model did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with CR in patients with HNC after accelerator-based BNCT. These findings question the utility of tumor SUVmax-based dosimetry, suggesting that current models require refinement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with HNC treated with accelerator-based BNCT (2020-2021). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Dose parameters (Dmax, Dmin, and D80%) were calculated using the uniform model (T/B = 2.5) and the individual model (T/B = Tumor SUVmax/Blood-pool SUV). Correlations between tumor SUVmax or dose parameters and best treatment response [complete response (CR) vs. non-CR] were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The objective response rate was 90%, and the CR rate was 50%. CR status strongly predicted superior 2 years overall survival, locoregional control, and progression-free survival (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the CR and non-CR groups for tumor SUVmax, uniform model doses, or individual model doses (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: 1⁸F-BPA PET SUVmax and the conventional individual model did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with CR in patients with HNC after accelerator-based BNCT. These findings question the utility of tumor SUVmax-based dosimetry, suggesting that current models require refinement.