DOI 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30197-3
Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the study is to determine whether amniotic membrane can be used as an alternative to conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision.
DESIGN
A prospective study of amniotic membrane grafts (group A) and primary closure (group B) was compared retrospectively with conjunctival autografts (group C) in patients with pterygia.
PARTICIPANTS
Group A included 46 eyes with primary pterygia and 8 eyes with recurrent pterygia, group B had 20 eyes with primary pterygia, and group C consisted of 78 eyes with primary and 44 eyes with recurrent pterygia.
INTERVENTION: For the above three different surgeries, the amount of tissue removed was estimated from histopathologic analysis, and the result was evaluated by clinical examination.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence, survival analysis, and final appearance were compared.
RESULTS
In group A, the recurrence rate was 10.9%, 37.5%, and 14.8% for primary, recurrent, and all pterygia, respectively (mean follow-up, 11 months). These three rates were significantly higher than 2.6%, 9.1%, and 4.9% noted in group C (mean follow-up, 23 months) (P < 0.001, 0.018, and 0.01, respectively). However, the latter recurrence rate was significantly lower than 45% (mean follow-up, 5.2 months) in group B for primary pterygia (P < 0.001). The onset of recurrence was delayed significantly in group C as compared with that of groups A and B.
CONCLUSIONS
The relatively low recurrence rate for primary pterygia allows one to use amniotic membrane transplantation as an alternative first choice, especially for advanced cases with bilateral heads or those who might need glaucoma surgery later.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.