MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328364d778

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in critical care · 2013

Novelties in biomarkers for the management of circulatory failure.

Legrand Matthieu, Gayat Etienne

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the present work was to review the literature on the role of biomarkers for the diagnosis, the risk stratification, and the management of circulatory failure.

RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has highlighted how biomarkers could guide physicians in making proper diagnosis of the cause of the circulatory failure, assessing the consequence in terms of organ injury and function, refining prognosis prediction and stratification of patients, and guiding treatments, in patients with cardiovascular failure.

SUMMARY: Because of the tight association between circulatory and renal failure, we put a special emphasis on cardiovascular [B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), Nt-proBNP, troponin, QSOX-1, sST-2, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide] and renal biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, cystatin C, liver-type fatty acid-binding protein, kidney injury molecule-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2). We also discuss nonspecific biomarkers (pro-ADM, glycemia, MicroRNA, chromogramin A) in this setting. We discuss the potential interest and limits, from diagnosis to prognosis reclassification, of cutting-edge new biomarkers, but also widely available and inexpensive biomarkers, in the particular setting of circulatory failure.

Для цитирования: Legrand Matthieu, Gayat Etienne. Novelties in biomarkers for the management of circulatory failure.. Current opinion in critical care. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328364d778.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.