Comparison of clinical outcomes of 2 platforms for topography-guided LASIK in primary eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare differences in visual, refractive, and ablating outcomes between corneal topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by SCHWIND AMARIS and WaveLight Contoura for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction.

SETTING

Department of Refractive Surgery, Guangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized study.

METHODS

Patients treated with LASIK to correct ametropia and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) with 6.5 mm of plan optical zone were recruited. In the AMARIS platform, there were 2 centration strategies: the symmetric (AA) and asymmetric (AS) offset modes. In the WaveLight platform, there was only symmetric offset (ES) mode. HOAs, contrast sensitivity, effective optical zone (EOZ), ablation depth, and ablating center were evaluated 3 months after the operation.

RESULTS

The study included 138 eyes. At 3 months after operation, the postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent was 0.04 ± 0.34 diopters (D), 0.06 ± 0.25 D, and -0.09 ± 0.21 D in AS, AA, and ES groups, respectively (P = .018). The EOZs of the AS and AA groups were 5.01 mm and 4.96 mm, and both were larger than 4.88 mm in the ES group (P = .04 and .03, respectively). The ablation depth of the AS group was 103.6 μm, which were larger than 86.6 μm in the AA group and 91.2 μm in the ES group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCHWIND AMARIS and WaveLight EX500 corneal topography-guided LASIK achieved comparable and excellent visual and refractive outcomes. The EX500 Contoura LASIK ablated less corneal tissue because of the smaller EOZ compared with the AMARIS, with a similar plan optical zone.