Morphology and cochlear implantation in enlarged vestibular aqueduct.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to explore audiometry following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and to investigate the effects of inner ear morphological variation on post CI audiometry.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of both natural and cochlear-implant-aided audiometry results, using all available measurements in a mixed-effects model accounting for longitudinal change and the grouping structure of ears. Patients who visited our tertiary academic medical center between 2000 and 2016 were identified as having EVA according to Cincinnati criteria on radiological examination; patients eligible for CI were then selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariable modeling showed a statistically significant hearing improvement in ears with EVA undergoing CI with regards to pure tone average (-64.0 dB, p < 0.0001), speech reception threshold (-57.90 dB, p < 0.0001), and word score (34.8%, p > 0.0001). Vestibular aqueduct midpoint size and the presence of incomplete partition type II (IP II) did not have significant independent associations with audiometric findings. However, multivariable modeling revealed a statistically significant interaction between IP II and CI such that IP II ears demonstrated a decrease in WS improvement of 30.2% (p = 0.0059) compared to non-IP II ears receiving CI.

CONCLUSION

There is a statistically significant audiometric benefit to ears with EVA receiving CI. Morphology, specifically the presence of IP II, may hinder CI benefit in terms of word score however this finding needs clinical validation. This data improves personalization of surgical counseling and planning for patients with EVA considering CI.