Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2004
Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Toffoli G, Corona G, Cattarossi G, Boiocchi M, Di Gennaro G, Tirelli U, Vaccher E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) increases the toxic effect of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (DOX) and prednisone (CHOP) in HIV-patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). To ascertain the cause of increased toxicity, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of DOX in HIV-patients with NHL treated with CHOP with and without HAART.
METHODS: Complete pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic analysis was determined in 19 patients during 38 cycles of chemotherapy: 19 cycles with CHOP and 19 CHOP + HAART in a crossover-designed study. HAART included protease inhibitors indinavir (IDV) in nine patients, saquinavir (SQV) hard gel in six patients and nelfinavir (NFV) in four patients.
RESULTS: No significant effects of HAART on pharmacokinetics parameters of DOX were observed. Similarly, no differential effect on DOX pharmacokinetics among IDV, SQV, and NFV was evidenced. Significant associations (P=0.012) were observed between DOX AUC0-infinity (area under the concentration curve) and G3-G4 WHO haematologic toxicity, in patients treated with CHOP alone, but not in those treated with CHOP + HAART (P = not significant).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that HAART therapy has no significant effect on DOX pharmacokinetics. DOX AUC appears to be a predictor of toxicity only in patients treated with CHOP alone. Other factors beside DOX plasma levels are detrimental for toxicity after CHOP + HAART. Therefore, pharmacodynamic interactions between HAART and DOX should be considered.
METHODS: Complete pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic analysis was determined in 19 patients during 38 cycles of chemotherapy: 19 cycles with CHOP and 19 CHOP + HAART in a crossover-designed study. HAART included protease inhibitors indinavir (IDV) in nine patients, saquinavir (SQV) hard gel in six patients and nelfinavir (NFV) in four patients.
RESULTS: No significant effects of HAART on pharmacokinetics parameters of DOX were observed. Similarly, no differential effect on DOX pharmacokinetics among IDV, SQV, and NFV was evidenced. Significant associations (P=0.012) were observed between DOX AUC0-infinity (area under the concentration curve) and G3-G4 WHO haematologic toxicity, in patients treated with CHOP alone, but not in those treated with CHOP + HAART (P = not significant).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that HAART therapy has no significant effect on DOX pharmacokinetics. DOX AUC appears to be a predictor of toxicity only in patients treated with CHOP alone. Other factors beside DOX plasma levels are detrimental for toxicity after CHOP + HAART. Therefore, pharmacodynamic interactions between HAART and DOX should be considered.