MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100943

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023

Digital vs speculum-guided catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.

Abu Shqara Raneen, Nakhleh Francis Yara, Haj Habib, Markdorf Sofya, Lowenstein Lior, Frank Wolf Maya

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Catheter balloon insertion into the maternal uterine cervix is routinely speculum guided; digital insertion has been reported, but it was not found to be more tolerable among nulliparas.

OBJECTIVE

In a cohort of multiparas, we aimed to evaluate maternal pain, the induction to delivery interval, and maternal satisfaction with digital insertion vs speculum-guided placement of a Foley catheter balloon for labor induction.

STUDY

DESIGN

This randomized trial was conducted at a single, tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. The participants were multiparas (parity ≥1) and were admitted at term for labor induction with a Bishop score <6. They were randomized to 2 groups, namely the digital insertion and the speculum-guided Foley catheter insertion groups. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The co-primary outcomes were visual analog scale scores (0-10) and induction to delivery intervals. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, maternal satisfaction, cervical ripening (Bishop score ≥6), delivery within 24 hours, infection rate, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 50 women were analyzed for each study group. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median visual analog scale score at catheter insertion was lower (4; range, 0-10; vs 7; range, 0-10; P<.001), and the induction to delivery interval was similar. For the digitally inserted vs speculum-guided insertion group, the median maternal satisfaction score was greater (5; range 3-5; vs 4; 1-5; P=.01), and the median procedure duration was shorter (2.1; range, 1.4-5.3 minutes vs 3.0; range, 1.4-5.0; P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, digital insertion (P=.009) and increased parity (P=.001) independently decreased the visual analog scale score. Cervical ripening, the maternal infection rate, and the neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Digital insertion of a Foley catheter balloon for cervical ripening in multiparas is less painful and quicker than speculum-guided insertion. It is also not inferior in terms of successful cervical ripening.

Для цитирования: Abu Shqara Raneen, Nakhleh Francis Yara, Haj Habib, Markdorf Sofya, Lowenstein Lior, Frank Wolf Maya. Digital vs speculum-guided catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100943.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.