MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000002444

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2022

En Bloc Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology.

Yanagisawa Takafumi, Mori Keiichiro, Motlagh Reza Sari, Kawada Tatsushi, Mostafaei Hadi, Quhal Fahad, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Rajwa Pawel, Aydh Abdulmajeed, König Frederik, Pallauf Maximilian, Pradere Benjamin, D'Andrea David, Compérat Eva, Miki Jun, Kimura Takahiro, Egawa Shin, Shariat Shahrokh F

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: En bloc resection for bladder tumors has been developed to overcome shortcomings of conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors with regard to safety, pathological evaluation and oncologic outcomes. However, the potential benefits and utility compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors have not been conclusively demonstrated. We aimed to update the current evidence with focus on the pathological benefits of en bloc resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The PubMed®, Web of Science™ and Scopus® databases were searched in August 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared safety, and pathological and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent en bloc resection with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 studies comprising 4,484 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Among 13 randomized controlled trials, the pooled 12- and 24-month recurrence risk ratios were not statistically different between the 2 surgical techniques (0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.23 and 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.23, respectively). The pooled risk ratio for bladder perforation was 0.13 (95% CI 0.05-0.34) in favor of en bloc resection. In randomized controlled trials, the differential rates of detrusor muscle presence (pooled RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.43) and of detectable muscularis mucosae (pooled RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.81-3.97) were more likely in patients receiving en bloc resection. Patients who underwent en bloc resection had a lower rate of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection than those treated with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors in 1 randomized controlled trial and 3 observational studies (pooled RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection for bladder tumors seems to be safer, and to yield superior histopathological information and performance compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Despite the failure to improve the recurrence rate, the more accurate histopathological analysis is likely to improve clinical decision making and care delivery in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Для цитирования: Yanagisawa Takafumi, Mori Keiichiro, Motlagh Reza Sari, Kawada Tatsushi, Mostafaei Hadi, Quhal Fahad, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Rajwa Pawel, Aydh Abdulmajeed, König Frederik, Pallauf Maximilian, Pradere Benjamin, D'Andrea David, Compérat Eva, Miki Jun, Kimura Takahiro, Egawa Shin, Shariat Shahrokh F. En Bloc Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology.. The Journal of urology. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002444.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.