MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800694

Медицинская библиотека · British dental journal · 2000

A 12-year retrospective audit study of tooth loss in a general dental practice.

Nicholls C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of periodontal disease in a general dental practice, and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment in preventing tooth loss over a period of 12 years.

DESIGN

This was a single centre retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A general dental practice in Bournemouth.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

Over a 6-month period from February 1997 to August 1997 records were made of all patients attending at the practice who had presented for dental examination between September 1985 and September 1986. A database was constructed to record the number of teeth present at the beginning of the study, those which at their initial exam had probing depths of between 5 and 6 mm, and those with 7 mm and greater. If teeth were lost, the date of the extraction was recorded.

INTERVENTIONS: All patients were treated by conventional dental therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tooth loss was chosen as the end-point.

RESULTS

13% of the patients presenting initially had periodontal problems, and conventional treatment resulted in very few teeth being lost over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodontal disease affected only a small number of the patients in the general dental practice. Those patients affected responded well to conventional therapy, resulting in very few teeth being lost during the period of study.

Для цитирования: Nicholls C. A 12-year retrospective audit study of tooth loss in a general dental practice.. British dental journal. 2000. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800694.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.