MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1808-86942010000500004

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2010

Correlation between the Friedman classification and the Apnea-Hypopnea Index in a population with OSAHS.

Rodrigues Marcos Marques, Dibbern Ralph Silveira, Goulart Carla W Kruel, Palma Robson Antonio

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: OSAHS is an important disease in current medical settings because of its association with chronic cardiovascular diseases and socioeconomic impacts.

AIMS: to establish the correlation between the Friedman Classification and the OSAHS severity through the Apnea-Hypopnea Index) in patients with OSAHS for assessment and surgery purposes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. We evaluated and classified 143 patients, using the Epworth's and Friedman's scale and OSAHS severity according to the AHI.

RESULTS

112 patients were submitted to polysomnography. We compared the Friedman Score and the IAH. The variables were associated with p<0.05. We found that patients with light OSAHS, tended to have a lower Friedman classification (better surgical result). By the same token, patients with moderate to severe OSAHS had a greater prevalence of Friedman's score of III and IV; p< 0.05 (lower success rates from uvulopalatopharyngoplasty).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the Friedman's classification correlates with OSAHS severity - the higher the Friedman's score, the more severe is the OSAHS.

Для цитирования: Rodrigues Marcos Marques, Dibbern Ralph Silveira, Goulart Carla W Kruel, Palma Robson Antonio. Correlation between the Friedman classification and the Apnea-Hypopnea Index in a population with OSAHS.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2010. DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942010000500004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.