MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.826686

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in physiology · 2022

The Interaction of Central Nervous System and Acute Kidney Injury: Pathophysiology and Clinical Perspectives.

Wang Yiru, Liu Siyang, Liu Qingquan, Lv Yongman

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common disorder in critically ill hospitalized patients. Its main pathological feature is the activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). This disease shows a high fatality rate. The reason is that only renal replacement therapy and supportive care can reduce the impact of the disease, but those measures cannot significantly improve the mortality. This review focused on a generalization of the interaction between acute kidney injury and the central nervous system (CNS). It was found that the CNS further contributes to kidney injury by regulating sympathetic outflow and oxidative stress in response to activation of the RAS and increased pro-inflammatory factors. Experimental studies suggested that inhibiting sympathetic activity and RAS activation in the CNS and blocking oxidative stress could effectively reduce the damage caused by AKI. Therefore, it is of significant interest to specify the mechanism on how the CNS affects AKI, as we could use such mechanism as a target for clinical interventions to further reduce the mortality and improve the complications of AKI. Systematic Review Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [registration number].

Для цитирования: Wang Yiru, Liu Siyang, Liu Qingquan, Lv Yongman. The Interaction of Central Nervous System and Acute Kidney Injury: Pathophysiology and Clinical Perspectives.. Frontiers in physiology. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.826686.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.