DOI 10.3109/09286586.2010.545932
Results of a rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB) in Eritrea.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To collect baseline data for planning of the National Blindness Prevention & Control Program and for monitoring future achievements.
METHODS
Sixty six clusters of 50 people were selected from a sampling frame that included all 2,593 villages in Eritrea (population 3.56 million). Within each selected village, 50 eligible people aged 50+ years were selected. All eligible participants underwent visual acuity (VA) measurement followed by examination by an ophthalmologist if the presenting VA (PVA) was less than 6/18.
RESULTS
Three thousand one hundred sixty three of the 3300 eligible persons were examined (coverage 95.9%). The adjusted prevalence of blindness (PVA < 3/60 in the better eye) in the survey population was 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-8.8%), bilateral severe visual impairment (PVA < 6/60 to ≥ 3/60 in the better eye) 3.0% (95% CI: 2.3-3.7%) and of bilateral moderate visual impairment (PVA < 6/18 to ≥ 6/60 in the better eye) 10.5% (95% CI: 9.1-11.9%). Of all bilateral blindness 55% was due to cataract. The adjusted cataract surgical coverage (percentage of people requiring cataract surgery that have had surgery) was 68% for blind people and 41% for blind eyes. Cataract surgery outcome was poor (PVA < 6/60) in 39% of all eyes operated in the past.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of blindness was high compared to recent surveys in Africa. Visual outcome after cataract surgery potentially could be improved by more detailed pre-operative examination, coaching of surgeons, and provision of adequate optical correction, including routine monitoring of visual outcome after cataract surgery. The development of intervention programs for refractive error and glaucoma should be considered.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.