Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2011
[A comparative research on the conventional transbronchial needle aspiration and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of mediastinum lesions].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rong Fu, Xiao Shu-Hua, Liu Jing, Li Ying-Xiong, Mai Hua-Yu, Lu Yan-Shan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostical yields and complication of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the mediastinum lesions under the same condition.
METHOD: Ninety-five patients with mediastinal lesions on chest CT were included. Bronchoscopy was performed under the local anesthesia, TBNA, EBUS-TBNA performed sequentially as a single combined procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 71 patients confirmed to be malignant, the positive rate of TBNA was 92% (65/71), and 96% (68/71) by EBUS-TBNA. There was no difference in malignant and benign lesions between conventional TBNA and EBUS-TBNA, but the success rate for obtaining adequate samples was higher by EBUS-TBNA (39/95) as compared to TBNA (22/95). Accidental injury of the blood vessels occurred in 7 cases by TBNA as compared to 3 cases by EBUS-TBNA, but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory diagnostic yields can be obtained by either conventional TBNA or EBUS-TBNA in skilled hands.
METHOD: Ninety-five patients with mediastinal lesions on chest CT were included. Bronchoscopy was performed under the local anesthesia, TBNA, EBUS-TBNA performed sequentially as a single combined procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 71 patients confirmed to be malignant, the positive rate of TBNA was 92% (65/71), and 96% (68/71) by EBUS-TBNA. There was no difference in malignant and benign lesions between conventional TBNA and EBUS-TBNA, but the success rate for obtaining adequate samples was higher by EBUS-TBNA (39/95) as compared to TBNA (22/95). Accidental injury of the blood vessels occurred in 7 cases by TBNA as compared to 3 cases by EBUS-TBNA, but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory diagnostic yields can be obtained by either conventional TBNA or EBUS-TBNA in skilled hands.