DOI 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000240
Association Between Size of Dominant Candidate Lesion on Four-Dimensional CT and Four-Gland Hyperplasia among Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Four-dimensional (4D) CT localization allows minimally invasive parathyroidectomy as treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), but false positive localization is frequent. We sought to characterize the ability of 4D CT to predict four-gland hyperplasia (HP) based on the size of candidate lesions.
STUDY
DESIGN
We retrospectively analyzed patients with PHPT who underwent 4D CT imaging and parathyroidectomy between 2014 and 2020 from a prospectively collected institutional database. The cohort was stratified into two groups, HP vs single adenoma (SA) and double adenoma (DA), based on operative findings and pathology. Logistic regression models assessed the association between the greatest diameter of the dominant candidate lesion on 4D CT and the outcomes of four-gland hyperplasia vs SA and DA.
RESULTS
Among a cohort of 240 patients, 41 were found to have HP, and 199 had adenomas (SA = 155, DA = 44). Patients with HP were less likely to have a preoperative calcium level greater than 1 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal compared with patients with adenomas (63% vs 81%, p = 0.02) and more likely to report symptoms (61% vs 43%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for BMI, we found an estimated 13% reduction in odds of HP for every 1-mm increase in the greatest diameter of dominant candidate lesions identified on 4D CT scan (odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
A smaller size of the dominant lesion on 4D CT scan is associated with an increased risk of HP in PHPT. Use of 4D CT imaging localization may provide evidence for differentiating HP from adenomas.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.