MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ken291

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2008

Successful mycophenolate mofetil therapy in nine patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Adler S, Lodermeyer S, Gaa J, Heemann U

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the therapeutic benefit of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF).

METHODS

MMF 2 g/day and prednisone 1 mg/kg were initiated in nine patients with radiological (9/9) and histological verification (2/9) of idiopathic RF. Out of nine patients, seven needed bilateral ureteral stenting due to extensive hydronephrosis.

RESULTS

All patients experienced regression of radiological extension. Out of seven patients, five were free of ureteral catheters after a mean of 5.6 months and two remained on stenting due to secondary stenosis. Within 6 months mean creatinine and CRP fell from 2.5 to 1.2 mg/dl and from 4.0 to 1.4 mg/dl, respectively. MMF was discontinued after a mean of 27 months. Prednisone was tapered to zero after a mean of 7 months. Side-effects were urinary tract infections in 7/9 patients and impaired glucose tolerance in 3/9. No recurrence occurred after withdrawal of glucocorticoids and MMF in 7/9 patients after a mean overall follow-up of 55 months (range 12-120).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with MMF and glucocorticoids was successful in inducing partial or complete and lasting remission in RF. The results suggest the use of MMF as additional immunosuppressive option.

Для цитирования: Adler S, Lodermeyer S, Gaa J, Heemann U. Successful mycophenolate mofetil therapy in nine patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2008. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken291.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.