MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114969

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2019

Comparison of Lowenstein-Jensen medium and MGIT culture system for recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from abscess samples.

Ma Yifeng, Fan Jun, Li Shanshan, Dong Lingling, Li Yunxu, Wang Fen, Huo Fengmin, Pang Yu, Qin Shibing

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: In this study, our aim was to assess Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium and MGIT culture system for recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) from abscess samples in skeletal tuberculosis (TB) cases.

METHODS

Abscess samples were collected from patients suggestive of skeletal TB in Beijing Chest Hospital for laboratory examination, including smear microscopy, L-J culture and MGIT culture.

RESULTS

Of the 232 abscess samples, 72 (31.0%) were culture-positive for mycobacteria. Of 72 isolates recovered, 94.4% were detected in MGIT 960 and 75.0% on L-J medium. MGIT could recover significantly higher rate of MTB isolates from smear-positive specimens than L-J medium. The mean time to detection of MTB in MGIT 960 was significantly lower than that on L-J medium.

CONCLUSION

The BACTEC MGIT 960 outperforms the conventional L-J medium in recovering MTB from abscess samples. The combination of MGIT and L-J method also increases the overall recovery rate of MTB in culture.

Для цитирования: Ma Yifeng, Fan Jun, Li Shanshan, Dong Lingling, Li Yunxu, Wang Fen, Huo Fengmin, Pang Yu, Qin Shibing. Comparison of Lowenstein-Jensen medium and MGIT culture system for recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from abscess samples.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114969.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.