Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2023
Efficacy of rh-PDGF-BB and Emdogain with or without DFDBA using M-MIST in the treatment of intrabony defects.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Priyanka M, Reddy K, Pradeep K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The versatile combination of emdogain or enamel matrix derivative (EMD), recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB), and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) has not been utilized in the treatment of intrabony defects yet.
AIM: The present study attempted to investigate the efficacy of a combination of simple, uncomplicated nature of modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) with EMD, rhPDGF-BB, and DFDBA in the surgical management of intrabony defects and to assess the possible favorable effects for a period of 6 months.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects were included in the present double-blind, randomized controlled, two-arm parallel study. The test group was treated with M-MIST by using rhPDGF-BB, EMD, and DFDBA, and the control group was treated with M-MIST by using rhPDGF-BB and EMD.
RESULTS: Differences between the mean values of primary clinical parameters including relative attachment level, probing depth, and gingival recession at baseline and those at 6 months after surgery were statistically significant in both groups. Inter-group comparison for clinical attachment level gain, probing depth reduction, and change in the position of gingival margin revealed no statistically significant differences. Inter-group comparison revealed significant differences in linear bone growth (LBG) and percentage bone fill (% BF) but no significant differences in the residual defect depth and change in the alveolar crest position.
CONCLUSION: The additional use of DFDBA provides superior benefits in terms of LBG and % BF in intrabony defects. This improvement might be attributed to the use of an osteoinductive scaffold.
AIM: The present study attempted to investigate the efficacy of a combination of simple, uncomplicated nature of modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) with EMD, rhPDGF-BB, and DFDBA in the surgical management of intrabony defects and to assess the possible favorable effects for a period of 6 months.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects were included in the present double-blind, randomized controlled, two-arm parallel study. The test group was treated with M-MIST by using rhPDGF-BB, EMD, and DFDBA, and the control group was treated with M-MIST by using rhPDGF-BB and EMD.
RESULTS: Differences between the mean values of primary clinical parameters including relative attachment level, probing depth, and gingival recession at baseline and those at 6 months after surgery were statistically significant in both groups. Inter-group comparison for clinical attachment level gain, probing depth reduction, and change in the position of gingival margin revealed no statistically significant differences. Inter-group comparison revealed significant differences in linear bone growth (LBG) and percentage bone fill (% BF) but no significant differences in the residual defect depth and change in the alveolar crest position.
CONCLUSION: The additional use of DFDBA provides superior benefits in terms of LBG and % BF in intrabony defects. This improvement might be attributed to the use of an osteoinductive scaffold.