Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession Using Gingival Unit Grafts: An 18-month Follow-up Study.
Аннотация
AIM: The study aimed to longitudinally evaluate the efficacy of gingival unit grafts (GUGs), a modification of free gingival grafts, in the management of Miller's class I and class II recession defects in mandibular anterior region, over a period of 18 months.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
17 subjects with 21 recession defects in mandibular anterior region were treated using GUG. Clinical parameters of recession depth (RD), clinical attachment levels (CALs), and keratinized tissue width (KTW) were recorded at baseline, 1, 6, and 18 months. Patient-centered outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and discomfort on 14th postoperative day and for treatment satisfaction at the end of 18 months.
RESULTS
There was a statistically significant improvement in RD, CAL, and KTW at 18 months when compared to baseline levels. A mean root coverage (MRC) percentage of 84.76 ± 11.79% was achieved at the end of 18 months. Patient-related outcomes for VAS for pain and discomfort as well as treatment satisfaction showed favorable results.
CONCLUSION
GUG can be used as a predictable treatment modality for Miller's class I and class II recession defects in mandibular anterior region. The results obtained can be well maintained over 18-month period with optimal maintenance care.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The advantage of involving marginal gingiva in GUG results in a well-contoured graft, which increases the ease of adaptation and suturing. The biological characteristic of intact marginal vasculature results in early integration of graft into the recipient area and greater success in graft survival over denuded root surface, causing better long-term RC outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.