Nature communications · 2024
Noninvasive in vivo photoacoustic detection of malaria with Cytophone in Cameroon.
СтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yadem Aayire C, Armstrong Jillian N, Sarimollaoglu Mustafa, Kiki Massa Civian, Ndifo Jean-Michel, Menyaev Yulian A, Mbe Anastasie, Richards Kacey, Wade Martina, Zeng Yushun, Chen Ruimin, Zhou Qifa, Meten Elvis, Ntone Rodrigue, Tchuedji Yves Le Grand Napa, Ullah Safi, Galanzha Ekaterina I, Eteki Lucrèce, Gonsu Hortense Kamga, Biris Alexandru, Suen James Y, Boum Yap, Zharov Vladimir P, Parikh Sunil
Аннотация
Current malaria diagnostics are invasive, lack sensitivity, and rapid tests are plagued by deletions in target antigens. Here we introduce the Cytophone, an innovative photoacoustic flow cytometer platform with high-pulse-rate lasers and a focused ultrasound transducer array to noninvasively detect and identify malaria-infected red blood cells (iRBCs) using specific wave shapes, widths, and time delays generated from the absorbance of laser energy by hemozoin, a universal biomarker of malaria infection. In a population of Cameroonian adults with uncomplicated malaria, we assess our device for safety in a cross-sectional cohort (n = 10) and conduct a performance assessment in a longitudinal cohort (n = 20) followed for 30 ± 7 days after clearance of parasitemia. Longitudinal cytophone measurements are compared to point-of-care and molecular assays (n = 94). Cytophone is safe with 90% sensitivity, 69% specificity, and a receiver-operator-curve-area-under-the-curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.84, as compared to microscopy. ROC-AUCs of Cytophone, microscopy, and RDT compared to quantitative PCR are not statistically different from one another. The ability to noninvasively detect iRBCs in the bloodstream is a major advancement which offers the potential to rapidly identify both the large asymptomatic reservoir of infection, as well as diagnose symptomatic cases without the need for a blood sample.