MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-025-06592-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026

Evaluating the diagnostic performance of MRI-based signs for identification of meniscus posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meng Chenyang, Zhang Tiexin, Cheng Qi, Han Changxu, Ma Xiao

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based signs for meniscus posterior root tears (MPRTs).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify original studies published prior to May 15, 2025 that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of MRI-based signs for MPRTs. All meta-analyses were performed using Meta-DiSc 1.4 software and StataMP 18.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis evaluated 9 MRI-based signs across 8 studies (1430 patients, 1,533 MRI examinations). In terms of pooled sensitivity, the cleft sign and ghost sign were ≥  0.8, while the radial tear sign was only 0.6. The cleft sign and/or truncated triangle sign showed the highest sensitivity (0.91). In terms of pooled specificity, the cleft sign and ghost sign were ≥ 0.85. The radial tear sign showed the highest specificity (0.97). In terms of pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), the radial tear sign was the highest (18.56). The cleft sign and ghost sign were ≥  10. In terms of pooled negative likelihood ratio (NLR), the cleft sign and/or truncated triangle sign was the lowest (0.13). The cleft sign and ghost sign were ≤ 0.21, while the radial tear sign was 0.41. In the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the ghost sign was the highest (0.97). The cleft sign and radial tear sign were ≥  0.9. In the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), the cleft sign was the highest (85.32). The ghost sign, radial tear sign and the cleft sign and/or truncated triangle sign were all ≥  50. Subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The cleft sign demonstrated the best overall diagnostic performance. High-sensitivity signs are recommended for initial screening, whereas high-specificity signs are indicated for diagnostic confirmation. The ghost sign and cleft sign, with their high AUC and DOR, serve as core diagnostic criteria.

Для цитирования: Meng Chenyang, Zhang Tiexin, Cheng Qi, Han Changxu, Ma Xiao. Evaluating the diagnostic performance of MRI-based signs for identification of meniscus posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06592-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.